- 1 Do they have a Final Destination 4?
- 2 What is Final Destination 6 gonna be about?
- 3 Which Final Destination is the scariest?
- 4 Why is Final Destination so scary?
- 5 Is Final Destination 5 connected?
- 6 Is Tom Cruise in Final Destination 5?
- 7 Is there a way to beat Final Destination?
- 8 Who is the killer in Final Destination 5?
- 9 Will there be a Saw 9?
Is Final Destination 6 confirmed?
Most Recent Final Destination 6 News – So far the only substantial Final Destination 6 updates that have been confirmed is that it’s indeed on the way. Not only is the sequel definitely happening, Freaks co-directors Zach Lipovsky and Adam B. Stein are confirmed to be the directors of Final Destination 6,
- Notably, after a year-long search by New Line Cinema, involving over 200 candidates for the directorial chair, Stein and Lipovsky bagged the gig by faking their deaths during a now-iconic Zoom call with studio execs.
- Moreover, while the movie was previously being written by Patrick Melton and Marcus Dunstan of the Saw franchise, the most recent Final Destination 6 updates report that they’ve been replaced.
Spider-Man: No Way Home ‘s Jon Watts will act as a producer and write the script. The decision for Final Destination 6 to move forward was officially announced at CinemaCon 2023 as part of the Warner Bros. Discovery panel.
Is Final Destination 1 and 5 connected?
Writing – According to Heisserer, Final Destination 5 was always meant to be a prequel, set before the first film; the idea having come from franchise producer Craig Perry. Heisserer said that one major problem he encountered while writing the film was coming up with good death sequences, believing that managing to do so in the world of Final Destination is “ridiculously hard”.
Do they have a Final Destination 4?
After a young man’s premonition of a deadly race-car crash helps saves the lives of his peers, death sets out to collect those who evaded their end.
Why did Final Destination stop?
Here’s why Final Destination 6 probably won’t ever happen It’s been over seven years since the hugely enjoyable Final Destination 5 and we have bad news for anyone waiting for a new outing. Speaking to, Tony Todd – who has starred in three movies as Death expert mortician William Bludworth – has revealed that Final Destination 6 is unlikely to happen. Warner Bros. “So there are other films like the Annabelle films which just focused on a doll that they can shoot for a lot cheaper and still make money.” Final Destination 5 received the best reviews of the series and is the second highest-grossing movie (behind The Final Destination ) with $157.9 million worldwide, so Todd isn’t completely ruling out hope just yet. It would be a fitting ending to the series as a whole, but that doesn’t mean we would say no to a Final Destination 6 if it ever happened. Want up-to-the-minute entertainment news and features? Just hit ‘Like’ on our and ‘Follow’ on our and, : Here’s why Final Destination 6 probably won’t ever happen
What is Final Destination 6 gonna be about?
Final Destination 6 (2024) Original title Final Destination 6 Year 2024 Country United States Director, Screenwriter,, Story: Producer,, Distributor:, Genre |, Movie Groups Synopsis As a group of first responders escape death’s grasp, they start to be killed by increasingly unlikely and killer mishaps. Movie Soulmates’ ratings Friends’ ratings Is the synopsis/plot summary missing? Do you want to report a spoiler, error or omission? Please send us a,
Which Final Destination is the scariest?
1 ‘Final Destination 2’ (2003) – Image via New Line Cinema Road tripping with her friends, Kimberly’s ( A.J. Cook ) holiday is cut short after narrowly avoiding a horrific pile-up on a busy highway. Haunted by a feeling that the terror is not over yet, Kimberly’s fears come true as those she saved are savagely killed, before a survivor from the first movie comes back to try and help her save those that remain.
- Everybody knows Final Destination 2, as it is the cause of our anxiety whenever we see a log truck on the road,
- This opening car crash is an amazing feat of stunt work and remains one of the greatest disaster scenes to be put on film.
- The deaths in Final Destination 2 are also the best in the series and perfectly one-up the kills from the first movie through greater gore and a more tongue-in-cheek tone, resulting in one of the best horror sequels ever.
KEEP READING: 10 Scariest Horror Movies Where You Don’t See the Monster
Why is Final Destination so scary?
Parents Need to Know – Parents need to know that Final Destination has intense scenes of violence and gore peppered throughout. The death of the victims in these scenes is not caused by another person, but instead by circumstance and “chance” instigated by the shadowy figure of Death, who is sometimes seen as a blur in the background. There is very little sexual content aside from a make-out scene and a glimpse of a naked women in a magazine. Profanity is limited to our introduction to the high school students at the beginning of the film. To stay in the loop on more movies like this, you can sign up for weekly Family Movie Night emails,
Is Final Destination 2 Based on a true story?
The accident on the highway was based on the 125 car pileup on Interstate 75 in Ringgold, Georgia, on March 14, 2002.
Is Flight 180 real?
Factual Background: Volée Flight 180 vs TWA Flight 800 – Flight 180 has been confirmed to be very loosely based on the real-life disaster of TWA Flight 800 that occurred in 1996 near East Moriches, New York en route to Rome, with a stopover in Paris, with high school students and had also experienced an in-flight explosion due to a spark igniting the CWT (Center Wing Tank).
Critic Roger Ebert, who praised the movie, called this allusion “a bit tasteless”. Jeffrey Reddick has since debunked this. The aircraft was a 25 year old Boeing 747-131, built in 1971, initially ordered by Eastern Airlines,but purchased by TWA brand new and registered as N93119 after Eastern cancelled its orders for the 747.
A/N: ( Trans-World Airlines is identified as Boeing Customer 31, and the aircraft is a -100 series, thus “-131 ) It is also loosely based on the crash of Pan Am Flight 103, a Boeing 747-121 ( Clipper Maid Of The Seas ) in December 1988 over Lockerbie, Scotland.
Many of the passengers were thrown out of the plane and fell to their deaths. Several people on the ground were also killed due to parts of the aircraft crashing to the ground. United Airlines Flight 811, a Boeing 747-122 also experienced an accident similar to this, however the aircraft did not explode and landed safely, with a gaping hole in the right side of fuselage section 42, which was caused when the forward cargo door blew off.
The door swung out with such force that it passed its normal stop and slammed into the side of the fuselage, bursting the fuselage open. Pressure differentials and aerodynamic forces caused the cabin floor to cave in, and ten seats (G and H of rows 8 through 12) were ejected from the cabin.
Why is 180 so important in Final Destination?
Le Cafe Miro 81 (turns into 180, when it breaks and kills Carter) The number 180, also known as the 180 curse, is a recurring ominous and common number and is a key element of the Final Destination series, It usually marks the imminent death of a character.
Why wasn t Alex in Final Destination 2?
- In the original ending for Final Destination, Alex dies in an explosion after saving Clear, but not before Clear becomes pregnant with his child, as implied by another deleted scene showing the possible moment of conception.
- In another ending, which was filmed, but never used, Alex is decapitated by a helicopter blade.
- Alex’s full name is Alexander Chance Browning in the novel, but in the movie his full name was listed as Alexander Theodore Browning on his passport. Because the novels are considered non-canon, the second one is considered to be his canonical full name.
- “Theodore” evokes the origin of his surname, Tod Browning, director of Dracula and Freaks,
- Tobey Maguire was originally considered to play the role of Alex Browning along with Kirsten Dunst as Clear Rivers. Two years after the film, they would go on to play the main characters and love interests, Peter Parker and Mary Jane Watson, in the critically acclaimed Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy (2002-2007).
- Alex is 17 at the start of the film, by the end of the film he is 18, and at the time of his death he is 19.
- The original script to Final Destination 2 revealed that Alex and Clear both survived, and both decided to help Kimberly save the survivors of the Route 23 pile-up. When it became clear that Sawa would not be returning to the role, still off-screen, Alex was going to be killed by a flesh-eating bacteria. This was later changed to a ceiling fan, and then finally to a falling brick.
- The discrepancy in the cause of Alex’s death is seen in the final cut of Final Destination 2. Clear’s vision board in her cell includes a note that reads “killed by a ceiling fan” However, the articles that Thomas Burke reads online state that he was killed when a dislodged brick falls on his head. The polaroid photo that Clear flashes Kimberly of Alex’s corpse also suggests the death by brick as no fan blade is seen in his head, as originally referred to in deleted dialogue.
- It is rumoured that Devon Sawa declined to return due to non-payment issues or a contractual dispute with New Line. The producers have stated the decision to kill off his character was a narrative decision.
- Alex’s death is based on the real-life death of Yan Zhen Zhao, when a brick fell onto her head back in 1998. The 16-year-old was walking past an elementary school in Brooklyn when the brick tumbled from a roof that was under construction.
- Alex’s death creates a major plot-hole for the second film: Kimberly says that Flight 180 was exactly a year before the pile-up of Route 23, and it is mentioned that Clear has been in the asylum for a year. However, Clear could not have been in the asylum for anywhere close to that long. The funeral in the first film takes place about a month after the plane explodes, and furthermore, the trip to Paris where Carter dies takes places at least six months after that. A news article states Alex remained in his home for three months after Carter died, which would have been at least ten months after the plane incident. Therefore, Clear locked herself in the asylum either ten months after the disaster when Alex died, and was in the asylum for two months at most, or sometime between then and when they were in Paris, which is between two and five months.
- In the script of Final Destination, Alex is described as: ALEX BROWNING, 18, an average kid; handsome. A high school “everyman.”
- According to Devon Sawa, he was never informed about his appearance in the fifth film ahead of him being invited for the film’s premiere. Sawa assumed this was due to a clause in the first film’s contract where it stated that the studio could use the footage forever.
- Alex was born on September, 25 (9/25), Flight 180 was to leave at 9:25, and Alex sat at seat I25 (Ninth letter of the Alphabet, 25th seat)
- Alex’s premonition death was almost exactly the same as Sam ‘s real life death.
- Alex is the only visionary who didn’t die together with another survivor as Wendy, Nick and Sam did (and if we count the DVD bonus for Kimberly as the canon)
- It was rumoured that if Alex returned in Final Destination 2 he would of been killed by a power drill, though this could be referencing the McKinley Speedway or Andy Kewzer ‘s death
- The death in his vision won the Primo Premonition award in Dead Meat’s Final Destination Kill count. In contrast, his real death won the Dull Machete award in Final Destination 2 Kill count.
Is Final Destination 5 connected?
The Twist Ending of ‘Final Destination 5’ Leads to a Heartbreaking Ending – Image via Warner Bros. Pictures The end of Final Destination 5 sees a reunited Sam and Molly alive, the couple eating together alone after hours at the fancy restaurant Sam works at. Another remaining survivor from the opening bridge collapse, the not-so-likable Peter ( Miles Fisher ), is in bad shape.
Candice, the poor gymnast who ended up a bloody pretzel, was his girlfriend. In these films, there is a way out of death’s snare. If you kill someone else, you can trade your life for theirs. Peter wants to do this but doesn’t have the courage until he shows up at the restaurant, deciding that he’s going to shoot and kill Molly.
Sam, being the hero of the movie, stops him, in a long kitchen brawl, before ramming a skewer through Peter’s back, killing him. Sam has traded his life for Peter’s, breaking death’s hold on him. Molly had barely escaped the bridge collapse in the opening premonition, so she was never on death’s list.
- Both of them are going to make it.
- Two weeks later, Sam and Molly board a plane to Paris, where they are moving because Sam is due to start a culinary apprenticeship in the French city.
- Wait, they’re on a plane to France? If you’ve seen the other films, you immediately start to get uncomfortable.
- As Sam is putting his stuff in an overhead compartment, he hears a commotion and looks up.
Some teenagers are being removed from the plane. These aren’t just any teens though. These are the characters from the first film. The twist has been revealed. Final Destination 5 isn’t a sequel, it’s a prequel. Sam and Molly are on the plane that blows up in the first Final Destination,
- Sam and Molly think nothing of it until the plane is in the air and Sam overhears a stewardess telling a passenger about the kid having a panic attack who wanted off the plane because he had some kind of vision.
- Fear crosses Sam’s face.
- He knows what’s happening and there’s nothing he can do.
- They watch helplessly as an engine explodes and the fuselage begins to rip apart.
Molly is sucked out of the plane, but it’s not quick, with Sam holding onto her hand, trying to save her until she’s ripped away and then split in half over the airplane wing. The plane then explodes in slow motion, the flames consuming Sam as he screams in agony.
- And if that’s not enough, Nathan ( Arlen Escarpeta ), another survivor who escaped death, is killed on the ground when the plane crashes and he’s crushed by an engine.
- The Final Destination franchise has fun with its kills.
- They’re meant to make you squirm but also laugh at their silliness. Not here.
- Sam and Molly’s deaths are painfully tragic.
Sure, many times the survivors die in the final scene, but not like this, so helpless to escape. Sam and Molly were happy. We cared about them. They weren’t just character stereotypes but felt like real people. When they die, it’s not out of nowhere. Instead, we see it coming, even before they do, and then have to wait.
There’s no jump scare, just slowly winding dread. Their deaths aren’t held back on either. It’s not a quick one-second splatter and cut to black. No, we see Molly screaming and hanging on for dear life. We see Sam screaming as fire takes him. It’s brutal and grim and sad, with not an ounce of fun to be had, and no laughs to be found.
Final Destination 6 is in the works, but it’s doubtful that it will have a sequence as painful and impactful as the final moments of Sam and Molly.
Is Tom Cruise in Final Destination 5?
Peter Friedkin is the secondary antagonist in Final Destination 5. He is played by Miles Fisher, known as Tom Cruise in the Superhero Movie. His surname may be a reference to William Friedkin, who directed The Exorcist.
Is Final Destination 3 connected to 1 and 2?
Development – Final Destination 3 was originally the last part of a trilogy and had been in development since the release of Final Destination 2, Franchise creator Jeffrey Reddick and one of the co-writers of the first two films did not return for the third installment.
Director James Wong said that unlike the second film, which was closely tied to the first and continued its story, the producers always envisioned Final Destination 3 as a stand-alone sequel featuring new characters. He said:e really felt that the idea of Final Destination, or the fact that Death can visit you and you can cheat death,
could happen to anyone.” By not using characters from the first film the producers could use a new plot, with new characters who would be unaware what was happening to them and react accordingly. The film’s original title, Cheating Death: Final Destination 3, changed during development.
- Craig Perry and Warren Zide’s Zide/Perry Productions, and Wong and Glen Morgan ‘s own Hard Eight Pictures that co-produced Final Destination returned to produce Final Destination 3 with Practical Pictures and Manitee Pictures.
- Initially, the film was to be filmed in 3D, but this was abandoned.
- Morgan said it was for financial reasons and because he believed fire and blood effects would not be shown properly through the red filters of anaglyph 3D systems.
The idea of using a roller coaster derailment as the opening-scene disaster came from New Line Cinema executive Richard Bryant and was not inspired by the Big Thunder Mountain Railroad incident from 2003 when a derailment occurred that crushed a rider.
- The Omen (1976) was the inspiration to depict death omens in photographs.
- Morgan said he searched the aisles of a store on Sunset Boulevard for days for inspiration for Erin’s hardware-store death.
- Loss of control is a major theme he and Wong had envisioned for the film from the very beginning; both Wendy, who is afraid of losing control, and the roller coaster exemplify this.
He said psychologists have confirmed one reason some people are afraid of riding a roller coaster is because they have no control over it and what happens to them.
Has anyone ever survived Final Destination?
- The Final Destination films alternate between the time of day that the opening cataclysm takes place. The Flight 180 explosion happened at night, the Route 23 pile-up happened at daytime, the Devil’s Flight derailment happened at night, and the McKinley Speedway disaster happened at daytime. Final Destination 5 seems to break from this tradition as North Bay Bridge collapse also occurs during the daytime, but it is revealed that the events in Final Destination 5 happen chronologically before Flight 180.
- Each film follows the same format:
- 1. Someone foresees a catastrophe, and manages to avoid the death of themselves and others;
- 2. Death reclaims those who were meant to die in the accident;
- 3. The last of the survivors come together in the climax were the protagonist believes they have finally cheated Death;
- 4. The remaining survivors learn they haven’t changed anything and that death is inevitable.
- The Final Destination series is somewhat notable among horror fans in that there are currently no survivors (with the exception of Kimberly Corman and Thomas Burke from Final Destination 2 ). Alex and Clear were the survivors of the first film but in between the course of the first and second film Alex had died. Clear dies in the second film. And as for the third, fourth and fifth film every one dies in the end (although the deaths of Wendy, Kevin and Julie can only be seen in premonitions).
- It appears that the first death in every movie is solo. No one is present to witness the death of the first victim, although this slightly changes in The Final Destination and Final Destination 5,
- Another theory related to this is that almost every 4th survivor/pair (Carter, Brian, Ian, Nathan) appears to be skipped, and the 5th survivor/pair dies almost instantly afterwards (Billy, Kat and Rory, Erin, Roy and Dennis).
- Due to its immense popularity and the fact there is no visible killer in the movies, the franchise has often been admired in pop culture for its originality and uniqueness among slasher films.
- In the first 3 films, the visionary never sees the first death. Alex did not see Tod die, Kimberly didn’t see Evan die, same with Wendy and Ashley and Ashlyn, Only Nadia ‘s death was seen by Nick,
- In commercial travel, “final destination” is a quasi-industry term that refers to a passenger’s ultimate intended location. For the franchise, it’s an obvious metaphor for Death; the ultimate fate or “destination” that everyone has. The title carries this double-meaning specifically concerning the events of the first film. However, it may vaguely apply to the next 3 films in the way that the subsequent events are all possibly byproducts of a ripple-effect created by the survivors of Flight 180. The 5th film of course is the big exception as it takes place prior to the crash.
- The original title for the first film was Flight 180, Had this title been kept, it wouldn’t have made as much sense with the rest of the films in the series.
- Series creator Jeffrey Reddick refers to the franchise as “Slasher Films Without A Slasher”, due to the fact that the killer is a being that can’t be seen.
- There was originally going to be a sixth film but due to copyright complaints due to media (images, audio, brands, logos, etc.) in the film having no rights to be used, it was cancelled. However, on October 5, 2020, Reddick confirmed that the sixth had been in the works during the COVID-19 pandemic, The film is scheduled to be released in 2022. Although it will not have a reboot, but there will be new storylines instead.
- On October 2021, Lori Evans Taylor announced that she will write the screenplay.
- In 2022, Jon Watts will be served as producer.
|Final Destination movies|
|Final Destination | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5|
|Final Destination novels|
|Dead Reckoning | Destination Zero | End of the Line | Dead Man’s Hand | Looks Could Kill | Death of the Senses | Wipeout (unpublished) | Final Destination | Final Destination 2 | Final Destination 3|
|Final Destination comics|
|Sacrifice | Spring Break|
|Jeffrey Reddick | James Wong | Glen Morgan | Warren Zide | Craig Perry | Toby Emmerich | Shirley Walker | David R. Ellis | J. Mackye Gruber | Eric Bress | Brian Tyler | Steven Quale | Eric Heisserer|
|New Line Cinema | Warner Brothers|
Is there a way to beat Final Destination?
New life – According to William Bludworth, only new life can beat Death. In an alternate ending of Final Destination, Clear Rivers had a baby with Alex Browning (although he is dead), so she and Carter Horton beat Death. In Final Destination 2, Kimberly Corman beat death by attempting to drown in a lake then she “died” for a short period of time before she was resurrected by the doctor thus granting new life and becoming one of the only two survivors who did not die by end of the series.
- However, in one of the alternate endings of Final De stination 3, it’s revealed that both Kimberly and Thomas Burke died while being sucked into a wood chipper.
- If one counts that as canon, then it’d mean no one in the series survived cheating death.
- One of the survivors – Isabella Hudson – had a baby, she was not meant to die on Route 23, so she couldn’t help Kimberly and Thomas with “cheating” Death.
The birth of a child who was meant to die is likely able to cheat Death, but we have not seen this scenario. Due to the tradition of every single last survivor dying, no matter how hard they try to cheat Death, it is possible that this may never be seen.
How are all Final Destination movies connected?
Warner Bros./YouTube The “Final Destination” film series has earned a place in the pantheon of classic horror franchises thanks to its unique take on an old formula. Rather than a psychotic slasher cutting up teenage meatbags, the serial killer in these films is Death itself.
- Every movie in the series, from the 2000 original to 2011’s “Final Destination 5,” begins with a horrible accident that kills many people in very R-rated fashion.
- This is later revealed to be a premonition glimpsed by the lead character.
- After a suitable freak-out, the protagonist and several of their friends/co-workers/random strangers escape their fate,
or so they think. Over the course of each film, the survivors of these accidents are picked off, one by one. Furthermore, with each successive movie, the kills become increasingly elaborate and gory. Here, we find the appeal of the “Final Destination” movies: It isn’t in the characters or their doomed efforts to elude Death, but in the deaths themselves.
Who is the monster in Final Destination?
In death, there are no accidents, no coincidences, no mishaps.and no escapes. William Bludworth, Final Destination, In the Final Destination series, Death (also known as The Grim Reaper ) is an active, cunning, volatile, supernatural personified force, and the series’ primary antagonist.
- While invisible to people, it nevertheless makes a somewhat noticeable and ominous presence wherever it goes and can manipulate any aspect of an environment to its will.
- Although the character of Death is never seen, in truth it is an entity that wants its design to never be violated.
- It has been highly suggested that Death essentially programs the events of a person’s entire lifespan, ultimately deciding where, when, and how they will die.
Should anyone deviate or “cheat” from what Death has set for them, whether deliberately or not, Death will punish them by using his servants to inflict the most gruesome and tortorous death. Despite it often being called “cheating” or “avoiding” Death, there are moments where Death seems to have planned for the survivors to escape as they were supposed to die later and the visions were to help them get to that right place at said right time.
The evidence for this seems to be the finale of The Final Destination, where Nick O’Bannon realizes that he and his friends were meant to die in a truck crash all along rather than a cinema explosion, Death maintains a strict order and, unless people die in the specific original vision, Death spares them from any future deaths in its plan to kill the survivors, maintaining its specific plans and their unfortunate problems of being caught up as bystanders such as people in Final Destination 4 who are in a cinema which explodes who are left unharmed.
Death seems to have a both a form of respect, however grudging that may be, and the ability to know when it shouldn’t draw out someone’s death – such as with Clear Rivers; Clear knew what to look for in the signs Death would leave and Death gave her a quick death in an explosion (something which featured in all her “escaped” Deaths too – no fewer than six), meaning Death respected her enough to make it quick but was also clever enough to know that she was dangerous as she could see signs and escape, so took her out as quickly as possible to ensure she didn’t escape again or help other people escape, once even breaking its own list to try and finish Clear off.
Who is the killer in Final Destination 5?
Death, also known as the Grim Reaper, is the main antagonist of the Final Destination film series.
Will there be a Saw 9?
Development – Chris Rock approached Lionsgate with his concept for Spiral as a way to renovate the Saw franchise and his own career. According to Chris Rock, the origins of Spiral came from a chance meeting with the vice chairman of Lionsgate, Michael Burns, at a friend’s wedding in Brazil, and he felt doing something in the horror genre would be a new avenue to take in his career, though he planned to include some comedic elements in the film.
Rock approached Lionsgate with his ideas of extending the franchise, who became very interested in the concept. Lionsgate’s CEO Joe Drake said that Rock’s idea was “completely reverential to the legacy of the material while reinvigorating the brand with his wit, creative vision and passion for this classic horror franchise”.
In April 2018, Twisted Pictures was beginning development of a sequel with Jigsaw writers Josh Stolberg and Peter Goldfinger. Following the release of Jigsaw, Stolberg and Goldfinger had been pitching a new Saw film focused solely on John Kramer / Jigsaw rather than on any of his established apprentices to series veterans Mark Burg and Oren Koules, but then Burg and Koules called the duo to inform them about Rock’s ideas for a new film, with Rock contacting them shortly afterwards to discuss his concept.
- Prior to that, other writers had pitched their ideas for the next Saw film to Lionsgate, but none of them had succeeded, while Stolberg and Goldfinger had come up with eight different versions for the film before Rock arrived and merged his idea with that of the duo.
- Burg and Koules instructed the duo to come up with a pitch for Rock.
Stolberg and Goldfinger did so, and their pitch was approved by both Lionsgate and Rock, leading them to write their first draft, which was greenlit a week after being turned in. Rock aided Stolberg and Goldfinger during the writing process, rewriting the story when necessary.
- An early iteration of the script had Rock’s character related to Danny Glover ‘s David Tapp from the first film,
- Stolberg and Goldfinger opted not to go in this direction as it “didn’t pass the smell test”.
- Tobin Bell, who played John Kramer / Jigsaw in all previous Saw films, did not return in the film, making Spiral the first film in the franchise which does not physically feature Bell or feature the Jigsaw character onscreen beyond photographs.
Bousman explained that the film’s killer is a “Jigsaw copycat”, not the original Jigsaw, stating his intention to not recast Bell in the iconic role. Bell had expressed interest in returning as Jigsaw if the story delved into the origins of Billy the Puppet,
Having Bell appear as Jigsaw in the film was widely discussed by Bousman and the crew until the last day of filming, but they felt that by bringing Bell back, the film would feel like the ninth installment of the Saw franchise rather than a separate film like it was intended to be. As the Jigsaw character was killed off in the third film, Bousman felt that previous films did a disservice by using flashbacks to bring Jigsaw into the story and he did not want to repeat the same mistake in Spiral nor to disrespect Bell’s iconic performance.
Every Final Destination Film Ranked!
Bousman considered having Bell sing a Johnny Cash cover during the ending sequence. Bell recorded the cover, but Bousman dropped the idea as too gimmicky. Spiral did not feature Tobin Bell reprising his usual role as Jigsaw, making it the first Saw film to not feature Bell. Although discussions took place after the first test screening and through post-production, Stolberg stated in an interview with Bloody Disgusting that Jigsaw was never included in any draft for the screenplay of Spiral, as the filmmakers felt that including the would alter the “DNA” of the story they were trying to achieve and their desire to take the franchise in a new direction.
Stolberg also felt that due to the franchise’s timeline, any possible connection between John Kramer and William Schenk/the Spiral Killer would have been when the latter was still a child. Stolberg and Goldfinger proposed a post-credits scene in which Kramer bonds with a young Schenk after the murder of the latter’s father, possibly giving him the puppet he later uses as the Spiral Killer.
While this would create a relationship like those depicted in the first seven films, it was ultimately decided to abandon the idea. In a further effort to differentiate between the two storylines, Bousman decided to replace Billy the Puppet with a new puppet, Mr.
Snuggles. Deeming Bell’s voice as too iconic, filmmakers feared that reusing it for Mr. Snuggles could have raised questions about the relationship between the killers; an early draft actually featured Jigsaw’s voice, which would then be revealed as a digitally altered version. The story originally had all the speeches taken from past recordings of Jigsaw’s voice using words in a different order.
The filmmakers struggled to find a new voice for the killer to replace Bell’s, testing numerous voices of women, children, and men. They finally settled on the computer-generated voice heard in the final film only two days before finishing the sound mix,